Wednesday, March 1, 2017

MONET's SELF-PORTRAIT hidden in his WATERLILIES

MONET'S SELF-PORTRAIT hidden in his WATERLILIES

Monet's two oval-shaped rooms filled with his Nympheas (Waterlilies) paintings (1918-27) in the Orangerie in Paris at first glance appear to have no human figures except the visitors looking at the panels.

The second room has three paintings that show the dark shadows of willow trees on the water line:
Some might wish to read those dark, thick trunks as human imprints on the waterscapes, but, in truth, the surfaces on these canvases are filled with the colors of light, clouds, waterplants, and flowers.





But in the FIRST ROOM of the WATER LILIES as you enter from the lobby,


approximately at the spot on the left wall marked by the arrow above, you will find a face hidden in the cloud reflections of the pond:
just to the left of the man standing in the photo below and to the left of the large dark mass of foreboding water depth:
It is the facial signature of the artist, who is following in the tradition of self-portraiture for painters, established by Masaccio, over on the right. (See my blog entry on Masaccio and the tradition of self-portraiture for painters.) If you compare photographs of Monet near the end of his life and the closeup of this section of the cloudscape in the Waterlilies, there is a wonderful similarity of form:
 
The artist paints himself into the painting with his long scraggly white beard, with darker greys near the mouth for the darker parts of the mustache and beard that have not yet turned white. The right eye appears larger as the left eye does in the photo. It is as if Monet were looking in a mirror to replicate himself. The lids above the eyes are darkened, too, and there is a suggestion in the painted version of the furrowed lines between the eyebrows. 
          Here is the artist himself, staring lucidly out into the light, out into eternity, presenting himself as the author of the works in the two rooms, inserting himself into the cacophony of paint he has used to create cloud reflections on the surface of the pond water. In the whole vision of the pond his eyebrows and lids become waterlily pads, and his beard is a mass of colored mixtures with white, pink, and gray strokes. He wishes his face to remain hidden in a totality that is not meant to be about him or about any human beings. As we have said in another blog entry, he wanted to paint infinity in two rooms specifically designed to imitate the scientific symbol of infinity. He places himself in the swirl of that infinity forever. He consciously inserts his own right to authorship in a painting collection meant to evoke a garden of beauty without human figures. Even his ear is a small projection on the right in the blackness that covers the canvas on the right in this first wall painting in the series.
Perhaps the dark mass to the right of this self-portrait is meant to pull his face forward out of the depths while at the same time evoking the dark unknown of death. (Monet dies in 1926 just a few months before the rooms are finished being installed in 1927)
                                    
He suspends himself, as he does his water lilies, between the sky and the water, in a cloud-like formation that keeps him aloft in space, even as he displays his skill at painting the beauty he sees on the earth.


22 comments:

  1. We actually saw this as well, also saw a few more faces scattered throughout the panels but to a picture of this one spot specifically

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi there, I am wondering where you learned about Monet's face in this painting? An employee at le musée l'arangerie pointed this out to me after we talked for awhile about Monet's modern take on art. I am writing a thesis on Monet right now, and including this fact about him drawing himself into his art, and I am wondering how well known this is. Do you remember where you learned about this? Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Feel free to quote me in your thesis. I haven't seen his self-portrait mentioned in other art history literature. When visiting the Orangerie, I realized Monet had painted himself over on the right of one of his canvasses in conformity with the tradition established by Masaccio, who paints his self-portrait over on the right in the Brancacci Chapel.(See my other blog entries on Masaccio.) Raphael follows the same tradition in the School of Athens, so Monet is showing himself to be part of the long line of artists who paint themselves over to the right, almost like a signature.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know of another painting of his (madame monet embroidering) where there is a face hidden on a flower pot, as well as a mad hatter on the entire left side of the painting thats hidden into the arch. I cannot see anyone having discussed those on the net so thought I'd check if you agree. This is the painting - https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e8/27/73/e82773b2a4e7e8880bb16ccb327babd4.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  5. let me know if you agree please :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, I agree that the flower pot has a face; I'm not sure it's a
    self-portrait, even a caricature of one, but it's in the lower
    right so it's in the appropriate place for self-portraits. I can't quite see the mad hatter that you speak of, but I've never seen this painting in person and the reproductions are poor, so
    I'm sorry I can't affirm that one. I'm glad you are looking closely at the paintings, though, and thanks for your response.

    ReplyDelete
  7. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bidru9J4WtZoIxD3BFGq5t7BzHZITht9/view?usp=drivesdk

    ReplyDelete
  8. So do you share my opinion on the mad Hatter?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I see what you are referring to and it is meant to be the sash-tie of the curtain that is drawn back for us to see the scene. You could read the two print dots there as eyes and the section above as an elongated hat, hence a face, but what are you thinking he meant by it, if intentional? The Mad Hatter is a character in an English story, which, to me, makes him less likely to be a point of reference for Monet. And why would that
    appear in a painting of his wife embroidering? He knows she is working with cloth and he's trying out his own ability to render cloth in various forms - dress, embroidery panel, and then curtain and sash.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Meant to add that I'm grateful you brought this painting in the
    Barnes collection to my attention for it is a splendid painting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. if you look at the image from afar, or see it in a smaller size, for eg https://www.google.com/search?q=monet+embroidering&sxsrf=ALeKk02Z6svLP3ekZE7bScsYyrgAS94JEA:1603716104593&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjf_e-FpNLsAhWfxTgGHYDaCN8Q_AUoAXoECAQQAw&biw=1536&bih=718&dpr=1.25

    then you notice that its obviously a mad hatter with an absolutely aggressive expression looking straight at the observer.

    i interpret him as protecting the peace and the woman as she's working in the quiet and peace.

    There is no earthly reason for there to be a face on the pot as well, but its there too.

    And the eyes, nose and mouth begin below the two dots , those first two dots in a slant are on the hat band.. its too coincidental that the arrangement coincidentally makes it look like a face.. it has to be intentional.. and yes its a great painting. you're welcome. it has always fascinated me because it does seem like a macabre twist is hidden in it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I thought I was seeing faces in Monet's paintings because I'd smoked too much but he actually deliberately put them in there. It's not just Water Lilly's that has faces in it, they all do.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have recently bought a Monet 'pears and grapes' I can see two faces . The pear on the right has a small face but one of the fruit is definitely a baby face/head.

    ReplyDelete
  14. can u upload a pic and point to what you see?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am so glad to have stumbled upon this post. I have said for years that I could clearly see Monet in the waterlilies, but never could find anything to verify until now. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you had your hunches confirmed. Thanks for your note, E.J. Duckworth

      Delete
  16. If anyone takes a closer look at his painting of his garden at Giverny, you can find numerous faces of men, women, dogs and other animals scattered through out the painting.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yes John found many face two of youg women a bust of a gentleman looking away and a frontal figure of a woman and a face of an older gentleman with glasses and a mustache plu his own in the middle.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Just returned from Paris and the Orangerie and I did see the face; had never heard of it before but am happy to find this post. However, it looked to me like another face in profile in the dark area to the right of the face. Almost like a woman’s; any opinion on that? I did take a picture that I thought showed both.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is it possible for you to download the woman's face so we
      could see where you saw it? Certainly sounds plausible,
      Emily

      Delete