Monday, January 20, 2020

4) COMPARISON of works for stylistic differences

4) COMPARISON of works for articulating stylistic differences

Every work should be studied in its context (original physical location and
historical moment) in order to fully understand its meaning, but one way to approach the differences between artists and periods is to look at the stylistic differences between works.

COMPARISONS:

Madonnas of Giotto, Duccio with  Domenico Veneziano’s St. Lucy Altarpiece:  




Contrast way space is handled with vertical perspective and 1-point perspective. 
Giotto shows some interest in spatial depth, but Veneziano’s is more proportional with bodies in space (bodies still a bit large for 1-point perspective of architecture but more accurate than Giotto.)
Light in Duccio and Giotto is holy light rendered with gold leaf, but regular consistent light source of natural light in Veneziano.
Not much interest in accurate anatomy in Duccio and Giotto, more emphasis on emotional response of spectator. Accurate anatomy and weight under drapery in Veneziano, spectator is actually addressed by saint John in Veneziano.
No signature of artist in Duccio and Giotto, Veneziano signs his work
across the step in front.

Cantorie of Donatello and Della Robbia



Comparison of Adoration of the Magi – Gentile da Fabriano, Masaccio, Botticelli -Look at the Gothic elements in Gentile as opposed to the Renaissance elements in Masaccio.



 







Uccello and Castagno – Generals on horseback in Duomo. Look at how
Uccello and Castagno approach the problem of painting a statue of a famous general.





Comparison of Last Suppers:  Castagno, Ghirlandaio, Del Sarto
 Look at how these three artists paint the same subject. 



Comparison of Annunciations:  Fra Angelico, Donatello, Della Robbia, Botticelli.  Look at differences in sculpture and painting for same subject.





2 comments:

  1. I first discovered your blog in May 2020 when I had been reading about the Sistine Chapel ceiling (my mother was doing a 1,000 piece jigsaw puzzle and wanted to know what she was seeing). I was curious about any relationship between Michelangelo and Dante -- and here you are!

    My own interest in art history (most periods but especially medieval and renaissance) is as a complementary field to my primary academic research (dissertation on Chaucer MSS and substantial work in Shakespeare) -- and I have always wondered how any literate human cannot be captivated by Dante.

    I've looked into other parts of your blog and appreciate how much you lay out for "just anyone." And I admire the use you make of your own academic degree to teach the rest of us.

    Thanks very much, and I hope you are well.

    Lois Rem

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lois, thank you so much for your comment. I do hope to make the art of the Renaissance understandable to a general audience. I will be writing more about Dante and Michelangelo in a future blog, too. Your own work on Chaucer and Shakespeare gives you a rich perspective from which to see the art of Italy. I appreciate your reading my entries on it.

      Delete