What Piero della Francesca saw in Florence in 1439-1441
Piero
della Francesca begins his artistic career at age 17 in Borgo San Sepolcro, his
birthplace. From 1432 to 1438 he is apprenticed to a painter there. At age 24
he takes a Junior Year Abroad, facetiously and futuristically speaking, and
goes off to Florence to study the art of the Great Masters he has probably heard
much about in Borgo. From age 24 to 26, 1439-1441, he has a job with Domenico
Veneziano in Florence, painting frescoes for the now-lost church of Sant’Egidio.
During that formative period in his artistic career he not only absorbs all the
lessons about light
Domenico Veneziano, 1445, St. Lucy Altarpiece, orig. for Santa Lucia dei Magnoli, Florence. (Uffizi)
Piero, Sheba Kneeling, Legend of the True Cross,San Francesco Arezzo, 1452-66.
that Domenico has to teach him, but he also views and is
influenced by most of the major artists either living in the city or recently
passed out of it. I will devote several blogs to the discussion of Piero's Florentine training and inspiration. For this entry,
A) Who are
the artists he would have encountered in Florence?
For the subsequent entries,B,C,D, and E - Where does their
influence show up in his painting?
A) LIVING ARTISTS in Florence in 1439-1441
Who,
besides Veneziano, was in Florence and still working in 1439?
Leon Battista Alberti, the architect, was back in the city after having been in exile until 1428. He had
written his treatise on Painting in 1435 in Latin, reprinted it in Italian in 1436, and was
writing his treatises on Architecture and Sculpture. Of the men Alberti
mentions in his dedication to Della Pittura, 4 of 5 were still alive and
working in the city:
Brunelleschi
(1377-1446) had just finished the Dome
of the Florence Cathedral three years before, in 1436,
and was working on the lantern for the Dome. He had completed all but the facade of the church of San Lorenzo (1421-1440), and his church of Santo Spirito was in construction.
Available
for public viewing in 1439-1441 were also the arches and columns of Brunelleschi’s Ospedale degl’Innocenti
begun in 1419.
Donatello
(1386-1466) was in the city from
1439-1441. His Sts. Mark and George, 1411 and 1417 respectively, were visible in outside niches on Orsanmichele,
and inside the Baptistery (open to baptized Christians) was his
tomb (1419-1420) of Pope John the XXIII, the Antipope. His marble David
of 1408 and his prophet figures for the Campanile could have been seen. His 1430 bronze David was probably in the private courtyard of the
Medici Palace, but Piero must have known these.
The Cantoria he sculpts for the Cathedral would be finished in
the year Piero arrives.
Luca della Robbia (1399/1400-1482) was alive and working in Florence.
His 7-year
opus of the Cantoria for the Cathedral had just been completed in 1438, one year before Piero comes to the city.
The reliefs Luca produces for the sacristy doors of the
Cathedral were not constructed until 1445-46, but it is possible that Piero saw
preparatory drawings or early molds for these during the time he spent in Florence. The
subject of one of those is the Resurrection, a subject treated later by Piero (1455-65).
Ghiberti
(1378-1455), had installed his public bronze panels for the North Door
of the Baptistery between 1403 and 1425 and had begun the second set for the
East Door in 1425. By 1439 he would have been halfway through the project that was finished in 1452. Since the Solomon and Sheba panel was the last to be completed, it is unlikely that Piero saw it between 1439 and 1441.
RECENTLY DECEASED ARTIST in Florence mentioned by Alberti
Masaccio leaves Florence in 1428 and dies in the same year in Rome, but his Brancacci Chapel
frescoes in Santa Maria del Carmine (1424-27) remain in Florence as his
visual legacy, and certainly Piero would have seen them. Masaccio is the only
artist Alberti mentions who is no longer working in the city in 1439.
ARTISTS in FLORENCE IN 1439-1441 not mentioned by ALBERTI:
Fra Angelico had begun his work for the
monastery of San Marco
by 1438
and his Annunciation would have been visible at the top of the staircase
entrance to the cells, but would Piero have visited a monk living there and
been able to view that image?
The altarpiece for the main church of San Marco,
completed in 1445 by Angelico, might have been a work in progress, but would
Piero have seen that?
Fra Filippo Lippi was
working on the Annunciation for the church of San Lorenzo in 1440; Piero could have viewed it before he left in 1441.
The Pollaiuolo Brothers were
alive and well and working during that period; their most important project for
the church of San Miniato al Monte, the Chapel of the Cardinal of Portugal, was
not begun until 1460 and finished in 1466, so it is unlikely the drawings for that were available as early as
1441. Piero may have known of the Pollaiuolos’ Hercules in paint and bronze,
since Piero later chooses to produce a self-portrait as Hercules
in his own home (now in the Gardner Museum in Boston), but his image is so different from those of the Pollaiuoli that one wonders if he heard about the subject but never saw their renditions. Piero had
his own reasons for painting himself as Hercules besides. His mother’s birthplace was Monterchi
(Monte Ercole, the mount of Hercules). He may have made the painting in acknowledgement of this family connection; the link with the Pollaiuoli is harder to prove.
Uccello’s Cathedral
fresco of 1436 was visible; the condottiero Giovanni Acuto’s image might have
had an influence on Piero’s images of fighting men later.
Uccello’s private
commissions for the Salimbeni family on the subject of the Battle of San Romano
may have been seen by Piero but they were not begun until 1435 and not finished
until 1460; certainly preparatory drawings might have been available from
Uccello’s workshop.
In the next entries (B,C, D, E) I will zero in on particular artists' works and show their reflection in Piero's paintings. These images would not have been the only influences on him, perhaps, and the influences may have walked a two-way street (Piero may have had an effect on the Florentine artists who saw his Sant' Egidio frescoes),
but when we explore the Florentine oeuvre of the period, we can find definite visual links. I will set
out a few examples by masters of sculpture, painting, and architecture from which Piero has chosen to imitate motifs.